<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authority, and it&#8217;s limit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manylogue.com/authority-and-its-limit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manylogue.com/authority-and-its-limit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laverne Yurman</title>
		<link>http://manylogue.com/authority-and-its-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-4656</link>
		<dc:creator>Laverne Yurman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manylogue.com/?p=543#comment-4656</guid>
		<description>Blessed is he who has found his work; allow him to ask hardly any other blessedness.
The fastest secret weapon to success would be to look like you&#039;re playing by somebody else&#039;s rules, while quietly playing because of your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blessed is he who has found his work; allow him to ask hardly any other blessedness.<br />
The fastest secret weapon to success would be to look like you&#8217;re playing by somebody else&#8217;s rules, while quietly playing because of your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Tziralis</title>
		<link>http://manylogue.com/authority-and-its-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tziralis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manylogue.com/?p=543#comment-11</guid>
		<description>@vitakis I had the very same concern while writing this. Typically, we use authority as a post-decision reference that justifies its enforcement, while here I&#039;m shifting focus to the decision process itself. Still, I think its the most appropriate term to use, triggering at the same time thoughts on the further extent of its applicability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vitakis I had the very same concern while writing this. Typically, we use authority as a post-decision reference that justifies its enforcement, while here I&#8217;m shifting focus to the decision process itself. Still, I think its the most appropriate term to use, triggering at the same time thoughts on the further extent of its applicability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panayiotis Vitakis</title>
		<link>http://manylogue.com/authority-and-its-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Panayiotis Vitakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 16:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manylogue.com/?p=543#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I am fully supportive of the core idea expressed in this post. Nevertheless, for quite some time after reading it, I was debating whether ‘authority’ is the right word to use. &#039;Authority’ has been very much associated with ‘power’, exercised in a multiple of non-negotiable, even forceful, ways that go beyond the notion of ‘because that’s the way it is’.  Translating this into a corporate environment, you end up with authority that cannot be challenged or skipped, since it stems from the hierarchical nature of the organization.  
 
In the end, I think that ‘authority’ is still the right word to use, since the multitude of meanings and interpretations of the word make this post an even more intriguing read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fully supportive of the core idea expressed in this post. Nevertheless, for quite some time after reading it, I was debating whether ‘authority’ is the right word to use. &#8216;Authority’ has been very much associated with ‘power’, exercised in a multiple of non-negotiable, even forceful, ways that go beyond the notion of ‘because that’s the way it is’.  Translating this into a corporate environment, you end up with authority that cannot be challenged or skipped, since it stems from the hierarchical nature of the organization.  </p>
<p>In the end, I think that ‘authority’ is still the right word to use, since the multitude of meanings and interpretations of the word make this post an even more intriguing read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

